Broken foot? Ate some bad leftover
turkey? Caught the flu? Want a day off?
For many, taking a sick day requires little thought. But by most estimates,
nearly half of all private-sector workers in the United States do not have a single day of paid sick leave. And more do not
have a paid day off that can be used to care for a sick child.
This, report in The Washington Post,
is the situation so many workers face today in the United States.
Low-wage workers are hit the hardest, with three
of every four lacking any paid sick leave. They also usually have no health-care coverage or work a full-time or more than
full-time schedule of piecemeal, part-time jobs, making paid sick leave even more unlikely.
When workers without sick
leave get a virus or an injury, they have to decide if they can take an unpaid day off and still make the rent. If not, they
often return to their jobs as security guards, cooks, waitresses and cashiers -- decreasing their productivity and possibly
getting others sick. Paid sick days can reduce turnover, cut down on health-care costs (although most companies that don't
provide paid sick leave also don't provide health-care coverage), and increase productivity and morale.
There was
movement on the paid-sick-day front last month. More than 60 percent of voters in San Francisco approved a ballot measure
that would require all businesses with fewer than 10 workers to give employees up to 40 hours of paid sick leave a year; for
larger employers, up to 72 hours. At every company, an employee will accrue one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours
worked, so both part-time and full-time workers would be covered.
It probably won't end with San Francisco. "I
think it really helps add momentum," Debra Ness, president of the National Partnership for Women & Families, said
of the San Francisco initiative.
The partnership and other groups are behind the efforts to require employers to provide
paid sick time. Although the federal Family and Medical Leave Act requires every employer of 50 or more to provide up to 12
weeks of unpaid sick leave, many people can't afford to take that time off.
A 2004 Harvard University study reported
that 139 countries provide paid leave for short- or long-term illnesses. And 117 of those nations guarantee workers a week
or more of paid sick days per year.
At least 37 countries have policies guaranteeing parents some type of paid leave
when their children are ill. The United States does not.
Randel Johnson, vice president of labor with the U.S. Chamber
of Commerce, pointed out that Europeans' sick leave is usually subsidized by their governments, not the businesses themselves.
"Money doesn't grow on trees," he said.
Organizations working for paid sick leave have been battling with
groups that say making it mandatory would be a burden on businesses -- especially small businesses. But companies in San Francisco
are not yet putting up a fight against the measure, which is due to become law Feb. 5.
The Golden Gate Restaurant Association
opposed the ballot measure, but only because of the process, said Kevin Westlye, executive director. "It was introduced
to us 24 hours before it went on the ballot," he said. The organization offered compromises of five days' paid sick
leave in the first and second year a worker is employed, then 10 days in years three and beyond, but it was too late to change
the ballot.
"Obviously, if someone is ill, they should not be at work," he said. "We did not campaign
against it. At this point, we're simply leaving it alone."
The problem, he said, is the cumulative effect on
small businesses. "We have the highest minimum wage in the country, universal health care and sick pay, all in a short
period of three years," he said. "Philosophically, we don't oppose these, but the question is, what is the right
amount?"
There is movement among federal lawmakers as well.
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Rep. Rosa
L. DeLauro (D-Conn.) introduced the Healthy Families Act in 2005, to require that employers with at least 15 employees provide
seven days of paid sick leave annually for full-time employees. Part-time employees would get prorated leave depending on
the hours they worked. The leave could be used for the medical needs of employees or their family members.
The bill
will be reintroduced in the next session, and Kennedy's office expects that the Democratic majority will help it go further.
Hearings are expected in the first few months of 2007.
"I think there will be, in this new climate, a lot more
focus on working families," said Ness of the National Partnership for Women & Families. "This is the kind of
legislation that is really supportive of working families and begins to move us toward putting actions where our words are."
According
to a recent survey, 65 percent of New York City's working poor -- the 340,000 people who work and live in households below
the federal poverty level of $16,000 for a family of three -- have no paid sick days.
"People with families who
are living paycheck to paycheck don't have the savings to make up for a lost day's pay," said Nancy Rankin, director
of research at the Community Service Society of New York.
Of low-income workers without paid sick days, 31 percent said
they did not have even $100 in savings to fall back on, the survey showed.
Aurelia Brown is one of those people. She
works 35 hours a week as a security officer, then 16 hours a week at another company to try to pay her bills. She has no health-care
benefits and no paid sick days. The Brooklyn resident has been with the company where she works full-time for six years and
earns $13 an hour as the fire and safety director for a building in Manhattan.
Brown, 44, has gone to work countless
times with a fever or other illness. This year, she had to skip about five shifts because of the flu. And three weeks ago,
she came to work with a fever. She had taken Tylenol with codeine the night before and was still groggy and sick.
She
has no savings. "I have to pay the bills," Brown said. "So you pick and choose what day you go in."
(The
preceding story was published by The Washington Post)